Poslao: 21 Okt 2009 23:41
|
offline
- knell
- Zaslužni građanin
- Pridružio: 25 Feb 2008
- Poruke: 634
- Gde živiš: Basin City
|
Izgleda da su svi poludeli sa izlaskom novog Windows 7 pa je to uradila i Panda koja na dan izlaska novog OS svako ko poseti dole navedeni link i registruje se dobija Panda Internet Security 2010 sa kljucem na godinu dana. Promocija traje 24 sata pa ko voli neka izvoli :
http://us.pandasecurity.com/w7launch/
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
Poslao: 22 Okt 2009 20:00
|
offline
- rapha
- Mod u pemziji
- Pridružio: 14 Feb 2005
- Poruke: 9113
- Gde živiš: Beograd
|
Razmišljam se da ga instaliram pošto je besplatan. Jel ga probao neko, valja li?
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 23 Okt 2009 15:28
|
offline
- apokaliptus
- Novi MyCity građanin
- Pridružio: 26 Jun 2009
- Poruke: 29
- Gde živiš: Novi Sad
|
Stavio sam prethodnu verziju Pande na Vistu i unistio mi instalaciju
Od onda ga zaobilazim
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 24 Okt 2009 10:58
|
offline
- knell
- Zaslužni građanin
- Pridružio: 25 Feb 2008
- Poruke: 634
- Gde živiš: Basin City
|
Danas sam dobio kljuc i instalirao Pandu. Radi za sada odlicno pre toga sam imao Aviru free i Zone alarm i mogu da kazem da je ova Panda laksa na resursima od njih.
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 24 Okt 2009 12:20
|
offline
- knell
- Zaslužni građanin
- Pridružio: 25 Feb 2008
- Poruke: 634
- Gde živiš: Basin City
|
2.5 giga
Mada sam citao na netu po stranim casipisima da je ova Panda jedan od najlaksih antivirsnih programa po resurse racunara, ko ce ga znati za sada su u pravu
Small Performance Impact
Panda did quite well in most of the performance tests. Of all the suites I tested, Panda's had the least impact on the Windows Installer test and tied for least with eScan on the zip/unzip test. It had the second-least impact on the browser test—a big improvement over last year's suite. And it showed the third-least impact on the file move/copy test. (Note that I made some changes to the performance tests in May of 2009, so only eScan was tested in exactly the same way as Panda.) To read about my testing, go to How We Test Security Suites for Performance.
The one test Panda didn't ace was the boot-time impact test. It increased the test system's boot time by just under half; the median for all suites tested is just over half. I did change this test in May as well, by relaxing my definition of when the test system is ready for use. Without this change, Panda would almost certainly have shown an even bigger impact. Overall, however, it seems that Panda's attempt to lighten the suite's impact on performance was successful.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2350354,00.asp
p.s sad sam pogledao u task menageru i ne znam koliko je relevantno ali zauzima oko 30 mb
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 24 Okt 2009 13:03
|
offline
- rapha
- Mod u pemziji
- Pridružio: 14 Feb 2005
- Poruke: 9113
- Gde živiš: Beograd
|
Iskreno, ni malo mi nije bitno koliko resursa zauzima neki program pogotovo ako je bitan (AV recimo). Džabe je ako se "ne vidi" ali je bušan totalno.
Hajde da kažemo da danas 2gb rama nije nikakav luksuz i da ga ima dobar procenat korisnika. Sa tom količinom nbe bi trebalo da štuca ništa.
|
|
|
|
|